Glycaemic index/GI
Although the GI system has been around since the 1990's, it has recently gained more acceptance within the diet and health industry. There are an increasing number of diet plans that rely on the GI system. Despite this widespread acceptance the academic applications to everyday life remain flawed and difficult.
Aim to eat a well balanced healthy diet based on a variety of
foods. A healthy diet should consist of a mix of carbohydrate rich
foods. You should try and increase your intake of low GI foods,
such as whole-grain breads, pasta, brown rice, wholegrain breakfast
cereals, beans and pulses and fruit and vegetables.
The current system also implies that foods with a high GI have no
other nutritional benefits. Bread is a low fat, highly nutritious
food packed with B-vitamins, calcium and iron. According to GI
tables, food like bread, broad beans, carrots, bananas and most
fruits are all high GI foods. On the basis of this one measurement
- these foods would be labelled as 'unhealthy' and avoided. In
light of the recent Department of Health 5 a day campaign -this
would be nutritional disaster. If consumers are still confused
about basic weight loss messages can we really expect them to
understand the many complexities and flaws of the GI system? We
currently need more reliable data and reproducible results before
we adopt this system.
The glycaemic index has been criticised on the grounds that values
for specific foods are not reproducible from one laboratory to
another or in the same individual on different occasions. It has
also been suggested that the glycaemic index of a food changes when
it is incorporated into meals or diets.
Factors that affect the glycaemic response include particle size,
processing, storage, cooking and the presence of fat and
protein. For these and other reasons the GI is not a valid or
nutritionally sound tool to use in the formation of diets and
eating plans:
1. Generally speaking the smaller the particle size, the
greater the glycaemic response. Soda bread scones made from
coarsely milled flour produce smaller glucose and insulin responses
than scones made from finer flour milled from the same grist.
2. The GI of a food is easily changed by actions such as
chewing. The more a food is chewed, the greater the glycaemic
response.
3. Similarly the rate of food intake may also play a part with
foods consumed quickly initiating a greater GI response than foods
consumed slowly.
4. Fat is known to delay digestion and protein is known to
increase insulin production. A given amount of fat may produce
different responses depending on whether it has been cooked with
the carbohydrate or added after cooking as a spread.
5. High carbohydrate foods are not consumed in isolation but
as part of a mixed diet. Bread is typically eaten with a filling or
topping. Add a slice of cheese to white bread and the GI
falls.
6. The cooking and storage of products may affect the GI
ranking. When bread cools a starch is produced that is resistant to
digestion (resistant starch). Processing can also affect the
response as the more highly processed the food is, the higher the
GI.
The Glycaemic Response
Every time we eat a carbohydrate rich meal, the carbohydrate content is broken down and digested in the gut and glucose is released into the bloodstream. This characteristic response to a carbohydrate containing meal is called the glycaemic response and is a perfectly normal physiological process. The hormone insulin is secreted in response and stimulates the removal of glucose from the circulation by muscle. In diabetics the secretion or action of insulin is defective and as a result blood glucose concentrations become elevated and can lead to long-term complications including diabetes, obesity and heart disease is weak. Therefore in diabetics there is some research to suggest that low GI diets can have favourable effects on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and on insulin secretion. However in normal healthy subjects, the benefits of low GI diets is debatable primarily because the favourable effects of low GI diets are not known to persist for long enough to actually to have any great impact on the body.
Not all glycaemic responses are the same. Some carbohydrate
containing foods produce higher peak glucose concentrations than
others. In addition some carbohydrate foods produce longer
glycaemic responses than others. As a result the shape of the
glycaemic response curve can vary a lot from one carbohydrate
containing food to another.
The concept of the glycaemic index was introduced in 1981 by
Professor David Jenkins as a way of measuring the glycaemic
response to a carbohydrate containing food. A low glycaemic index
food is digested more slowly and as a result has a smaller impact
on the peak blood glucose concentration but may produce a longer
glycaemic response than a high glycaemic index food. Low glycaemic
index foods are considered better for diabetics because they help
minimise their exaggerated glycaemic response.
